|
Date:
|
4/25/2009 2:00:00 PM
|
|
From:
|
Declan Murphy
|
|
Subject:
|
NBR'S JAPAN FORUM (SOC) Japan-Pays-Foreign-Workers-to-GoHome
|
View complete thread
> >> Dave Wrote: > >> I find it strange the restriction on requiring the people who > choose to repatriate to agree to never return. > Jerry Cullins wrote: >> I don't see that restriction. I see a restriction on returning if you > take the money from the government. This seems to make sense to me - > the government has looked at the cost of the social programs for the > Nikkei and decided that it is less expensive to economically > incentivise them to return to Brazil than it is to keep paying for > those social programs. >
More likely, the government is looking at focus group polling since there is an election due this year.
I have lived and worked in Toyota-ville for the last 17 years. Last year (and for all of the preceding 5 years) the average Brazilian auto industry worker earned about 360000 yen per month including overtime. Those with forklift licenses etc, earned more. ie roughly a little more than say, an American academic working in Hokkaido or Kyushu etc. Most of these unemployed workers have already paid more nenkin contributions than the repatriation payment, and a lot more than the 70% refund of the first 3 years of nenkin contributions.
> If they chose to return on their own, without taking the money, I > haven't seen anything to indicate that they wouldn't be able to return > later when jobs were available. >
It was stated quite explicitly at the public meetings in Hamamatsu (Honda-ville) that a) they could not return - ever, and b) neither could *any of their children currently in Japan*. An extremely silly policy, especially since within the next 24-30 months, local corporations will be complaining of a labour shortage.
>To quote a different article I think makes a great deal more sense than government >committees generally make - “Naturally, we don’t want those same people back in Japan >after a couple of months,” Mr. Kawasaki said. “Japanese taxpayers would >ask, ‘What kind of ridiculous policy is this?’ "
In exactly what sense were these Brazilians *not Japanese taxpayers* ? In central Japan their tax (and other) contributions far outweighed any public sector expenditures undertaken on their behalf.
Regards ,Declan Okazaki, Aichi yamasa.org
|